2001 Mahindra Armada vs. 1995 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2001 Mahindra Armada is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Toyota Celica (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2001 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2001 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 905 kg more than 1995 Toyota Celica.
Because 2001 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mahindra Armada | 1995 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Celica |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1762 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1095 kg |
