2001 Mahindra Armada vs. 2012 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2012 Kia Cee'd is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Kia Cee'd (108 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2001 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 2001 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 601 kg more than 2012 Kia Cee'd.
Because 2001 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Kia Cee'd. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mahindra Armada | 2012 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Mahindra | Kia |
Model | Armada | Cee'd |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4480 mm |