2001 Mahindra Bolero vs. 1967 Plymouth Fury

To start off, 2001 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Plymouth Fury. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Plymouth Fury would be higher. At 6,295 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Plymouth Fury is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Plymouth Fury (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 2001 Mahindra Bolero. (72 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Plymouth Fury should accelerate faster than 2001 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Plymouth Fury weights approximately 261 kg more than 2001 Mahindra Bolero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Plymouth Fury. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Plymouth Fury (577 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 422 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mahindra Bolero. (155 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1967 Plymouth Fury will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mahindra Bolero. 1967 Plymouth Fury has automatic transmission and 2001 Mahindra Bolero has manual transmission. 2001 Mahindra Bolero will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1967 Plymouth Fury will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: