2001 Mazda 6 vs. 1942 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda 6 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10.
Because 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda 6 | 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | PV 801-10 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1942 |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3260 mm |