2001 Mazda 6 vs. 1947 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,481 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1947 Talbot T 26 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 6. (164 HP @ 6800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1947 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 185 kg more than 2001 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1947 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda 6 | 1947 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Mazda | Talbot |
Model | 6 | T 26 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1947 |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 4481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3130 mm |