2001 Mazda 6 vs. 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda 6 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda 6 | 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Mazda | Studebaker |
Model | 6 | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2001 | 1958 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2980 mm |