2001 Mazda 6 vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda 6 (163 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda 6 weights approximately 253 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2001 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda 6 | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 6 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 54 L |