2001 Mazda 6 vs. 1963 Steyr 700C

To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1963 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda 6 weights approximately 810 kg more than 1963 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Steyr 700C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Steyr 700C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda 6 (181 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Steyr 700C. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2001 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Steyr 700C.

Compare all specifications: