2001 Mazda 6 vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda 6 weights approximately 528 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda 6 | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | 9 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.2:1 |
Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 138 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 38 L |