2001 Mazda 6 vs. 1987 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda 6 (142 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1987 Ford Aerostar. (88 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Aerostar.
Because 1987 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda 6 (181 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Ford Aerostar. (160 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda 6 | 1987 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 6 | Aerostar |
Year Released | 2001 | 1987 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 88 HP |
Torque | 181 Nm | 160 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3030 mm |