2001 Mazda 6 vs. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda 6 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1989 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda 6 | 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | 6 | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1989 |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 164 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1910 mm |
