2001 Mazda 6 vs. 1996 Volvo 850
To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 2,461 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Volvo 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volvo 850 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 6. (119 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 850 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volvo 850 weights approximately 8 kg more than 2001 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda 6 (311 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volvo 850. (290 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2001 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volvo 850.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda 6 | 1996 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | 850 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1493 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2670 mm |