2001 Mazda 6 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda 6 (119 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 125 kg more than 2001 Mazda 6.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda 6. (311 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda 6 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 6 | Celica |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 622 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 87 L |