2001 Mazda 6 vs. 2007 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2007 Nissan Armada is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Armada (318 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 6. (142 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 6.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 341 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda 6. (181 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2007 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda 6. 2007 Nissan Armada has automatic transmission and 2001 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2001 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Nissan Armada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda 6 | 2007 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 6 | Armada |
Year Released | 2001 | 2007 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 106 L |