2001 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 6. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-350 weights approximately 126 kg more than 2001 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (232 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda 6. (165 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda 6 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 6 | E-350 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1496 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.3 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 62 L |