2001 Mazda 6 vs. 2012 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Korando is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Korando (175 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 6. (139 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 6.
Because 2012 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 2012 SsangYong Korando has manual transmission. 2012 SsangYong Korando will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda 6 | 2012 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
Model | 6 | Korando |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 175 HP |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.1 seconds | 10 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |