2001 Mazda 626 vs. 1960 Renault Juva
To start off, 2001 Mazda 626 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda 626 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1960 Renault Juva.
Because 1960 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda 626 | 1960 Renault Juva | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 626 | Juva |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1840 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 38 L |
