2001 Mazda 626 vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2001 Mazda 626 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Volvo 140 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 626. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 626.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda 626 (230 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2001 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda 626 | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 626 | 140 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2127 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |
