2001 Mazda 626 vs. 1994 Volvo 850
To start off, 2001 Mazda 626 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 1994 Volvo 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Volvo 850 (240 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 626. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Volvo 850 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Volvo 850 (407 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda 626. (230 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1994 Volvo 850 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda 626 | 1994 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 626 | 850 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 407 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2670 mm |