2001 Mazda 626 vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z

To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 626. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda 626 weights approximately 77 kg more than 2012 Honda CR-Z.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda 626 (230 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda CR-Z. (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM). This means 2001 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda CR-Z.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Mazda 626 2012 Honda CR-Z
Make Mazda Honda
Model 626 CR-Z
Year Released 2001 2012
Body Type Station Wagon Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 108 HP 122 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 230 Nm 173 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 1000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline / Electric Hybrid
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1290 kg 1213 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 4079 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2436 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 40 L