2001 Mazda 626 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda 626 (108 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda 626 (230 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda 626 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 626 | Micra |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 46 L |