2001 Mazda Atenza vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2001 Mazda Atenza is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,446 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 750 kg more than 2001 Mazda Atenza.
Because 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda Atenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda Atenza | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | Atenza | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2001 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 7446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2960 mm |