2001 Mazda Atenza vs. 1987 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2001 Mazda Atenza is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda Atenza (103 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1987 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda Atenza should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Ford Tempo weights approximately 75 kg more than 2001 Mazda Atenza.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda Atenza (240 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda Atenza will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda Atenza | 1987 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | Atenza | Tempo |
Year Released | 2001 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2540 mm |