2001 Mazda Atenza vs. 1994 Nissan Pulsar

To start off, 2001 Mazda Atenza is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda Atenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2001 Mazda Atenza. (103 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda Atenza. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 70 kg more than 2001 Mazda Atenza. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda Atenza (240 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Nissan Pulsar. (147 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda Atenza will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Nissan Pulsar. 2001 Mazda Atenza has automatic transmission and 1994 Nissan Pulsar has manual transmission. 1994 Nissan Pulsar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda Atenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: