2001 Mazda Atenza vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda Atenza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda Atenza would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2001 Mazda Atenza. (103 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda Atenza.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda Atenza (240 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda Atenza will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda Atenza | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | Atenza | Epica |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |