2001 Mazda Atenza vs. 2010 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2010 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda Atenza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda Atenza would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda Atenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda Atenza (103 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2010 Hyundai Matrix. (102 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda Atenza should accelerate faster than 2010 Hyundai Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 293 kg more than 2001 Mazda Atenza.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda Atenza (240 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Hyundai Matrix. (141 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda Atenza will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Hyundai Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda Atenza | 2010 Hyundai Matrix | |
Make | Mazda | Hyundai |
Model | Atenza | Matrix |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 141 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1323 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |