2001 Mazda Atenza vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda Atenza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda Atenza would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda Atenza weights approximately 190 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda Atenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda Atenza (240 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda Atenza will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda Atenza | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Mazda | Smart |
Model | Atenza | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 92 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 1867 mm |