2001 Mazda AZ vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 648 kg more than 2001 Mazda AZ.
Because 2001 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Jeep Commander. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2001 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 2001 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda AZ | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | AZ | Commander |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1398 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2790 mm |