2001 Mazda AZ vs. 2012 Koenigsegg Agera
To start off, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Koenigsegg Agera weights approximately 540 kg more than 2001 Mazda AZ.
Because 2001 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Koenigsegg Agera. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda AZ | 2012 Koenigsegg Agera | |
| Make | Mazda | Koenigsegg |
| Model | AZ | Agera |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 927 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2660 mm |
