2001 Mazda B2500 vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 115 more horse power than 2001 Mazda B2500. (82 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 427 kg more than 2010 Acura CSX.
Because 2001 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Acura CSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda B2500 | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Mazda | Acura |
Model | B2500 | CSX |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2700 mm |