2001 Mazda B2500 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 2001 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 262 kg more than 2001 Mazda B2500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (340 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda B2500. (194 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda B2500 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
Model | B2500 | XF |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 194 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 2002 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2909 mm |