2001 Mazda B2500 vs. 2013 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (380 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 298 more horse power than 2001 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 30 kg more than 2013 Jaguar XK.

Because 2001 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XK (515 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda B2500. (194 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda B2500.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Mazda B2500 2013 Jaguar XK
Make Mazda Jaguar
Model B2500 XK
Year Released 2001 2013
Body Type Pickup Coupe
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 2497 cc 5000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 82 HP 380 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 194 Nm 515 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 3 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1740 kg 1710 kg
Vehicle Length 5010 mm 4794 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 2032 mm
Vehicle Height 1620 mm 1322 mm
Wheelbase Size 2990 mm 2752 mm