2001 Mazda B4000 vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda B4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda B4000 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda B4000 (207 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2012 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda B4000. (324 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda B4000.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda B4000 | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | B4000 | Colorado |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 324 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |