2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1959 Opel Record
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Opel Record. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Opel Record would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1959 Opel Record is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Opel Record. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1959 Opel Record has manual transmission. 1959 Opel Record will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 1959 Opel Record | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | CU-X | Record |
Year Released | 2001 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1690 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |