2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1967 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Skoda Octavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Skoda Octavia would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1967 Skoda Octavia. (44 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1967 Skoda Octavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 375 kg more than 1967 Skoda Octavia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Skoda Octavia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Skoda Octavia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Skoda Octavia. (82 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Skoda Octavia.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 1967 Skoda Octavia | |
Make | Mazda | Skoda |
Model | CU-X | Octavia |
Year Released | 2001 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1221 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 82 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 970 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 30 L |