2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1968 Nissan Gloria
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Gloria. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Gloria would be higher. At 1,988 cc, 1968 Nissan Gloria is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Gloria. (89 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Gloria. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 49 kg more than 1968 Nissan Gloria. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Nissan Gloria is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Nissan Gloria. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Gloria. (160 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Gloria.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 1968 Nissan Gloria | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | CU-X | Gloria |
Year Released | 2001 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1988 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 160 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1296 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |