2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1972 Renault 5
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 5 would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1972 Renault 5. (33 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1972 Renault 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 630 kg more than 1972 Renault 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Renault 5. (53 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Renault 5.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 1972 Renault 5 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | CU-X | 5 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 782 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 53 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 715 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |