2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1973 Mazda 616
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 435 kg more than 1973 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 1973 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | CU-X | 616 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1586 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 910 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2480 mm |
