2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 935 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Because 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Mazda | Rolls-Royce |
Model | CU-X | Corniche |
Year Released | 2001 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 6750 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 2280 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3030 mm |