2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 137 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Because 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | CU-X | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2001 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 3790 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1482 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2760 mm |