2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1980 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 525 kg more than 1980 Toyota Tercel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1980 Toyota Tercel has manual transmission. 1980 Toyota Tercel will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 1980 Toyota Tercel | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | CU-X | Tercel |
Year Released | 2001 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1294 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 820 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |