2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1982 Subaru Rex
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Subaru Rex. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Subaru Rex would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1982 Subaru Rex. (36 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1982 Subaru Rex. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 785 kg more than 1982 Subaru Rex. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Subaru Rex. (54 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Subaru Rex.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 1982 Subaru Rex | |
Make | Mazda | Subaru |
Model | CU-X | Rex |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 665 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 54 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 560 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2260 mm |