2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1986 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Toyota Corolla (123 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 355 kg more than 1986 Toyota Corolla.
Because 1986 Toyota Corolla is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Corolla. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Toyota Corolla. (142 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 1986 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | CU-X | Corolla |
Year Released | 2001 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1587 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 142 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 990 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 75 L |