2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1992 Volvo 245
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Volvo 245 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Volvo 245 (116 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 245 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Because 1992 Volvo 245 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Volvo 245. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Volvo 245. (157 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Volvo 245. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1992 Volvo 245 has manual transmission. 1992 Volvo 245 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 1992 Volvo 245 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | CU-X | 245 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1986 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2660 mm |