2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora (251 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 392 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora (353 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | CU-X | Aurora |
Year Released | 2001 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 3995 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1737 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 75 L |