2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1997 Renault Espace
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Renault Espace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Renault Espace would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Renault Espace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Espace (111 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Espace should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Espace weights approximately 145 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Espace. (168 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Espace.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 1997 Renault Espace | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | CU-X | Espace |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 168 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1490 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2710 mm |
