2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1997 Volvo V40
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Volvo V40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Volvo V40 would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Volvo V40 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 105 kg more than 1997 Volvo V40.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Volvo V40. (143 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Volvo V40. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1997 Volvo V40 has manual transmission. 1997 Volvo V40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 1997 Volvo V40 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | CU-X | V40 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1588 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 143 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1240 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2570 mm |