2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1998 Samsung SM5
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Samsung SM5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Samsung SM5 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Samsung SM5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Samsung SM5 (133 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Samsung SM5 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Samsung SM5 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Samsung SM5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Samsung SM5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Samsung SM5. (184 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Samsung SM5.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 1998 Samsung SM5 | |
Make | Mazda | Samsung |
Model | CU-X | SM5 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1445 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2710 mm |