2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2002 Audi A3
To start off, 2002 Audi A3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A3 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 5 kg more than 2002 Audi A3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A3 (320 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 2002 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Mazda | Audi |
| Model | CU-X | A3 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1967 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1340 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 55 L |
