2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2003 Spyker C8
To start off, 2003 Spyker C8 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 195 kg more than 2003 Spyker C8.
Because 2003 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 2003 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Mazda | Spyker |
Model | CU-X | C8 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 4172 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1150 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 100 L |